Poems
by KJ Hannah Greenberg
(Mis)understandings of Nonideological Rhetoric
Too often, contemporary individuals, plus institutions, build
Intolerance from interactive nonaffinity. Likewise, arrogance.
Fiddles exercising freedom; choice becomes indeterminate.
When consubstantiations uniqueness starts entering outliers,
Forced thinking adjusts to compare disintegrative tête-à-têtes
(That talk fixates on personal habits and collective behaviors.)
Elitists, to preserve rank, withhold the utilization of monikers,
Legitimize unconventional exchanges, encourage such baser
Divisions. Unbound, unhampered counterpoints provide less
Clarity on relative virtues of transindividual insights; contrasts
Modestly illuminate, unify, or recognize how vital ends benefit
Explorations of self, other, when built of natural scruples.
Private comprehensions of the meaning/morality nexus affect
Social systems. Otherwise, select forms of cultural dissonance,
Sometimes, helps consciousness-raising cut suffering. Forever,
Crueltys heightened, set in social-political contexts. Moreover,
Revenge disproves selves, wipes away victimhood by means of
Destroying distinctiveness. Mysticism switches me with us.
Thus, the teaching of diversity persists as subjective pursuits
(Educational provisions dont necessarily transcend statutory
Issues.) Disclosure stays object lessons whose intentions injure
Audiences welfare. Among unenlightened, opinions on hazard
Vary. Forever, rhetors want freedom to select amid encounters,
To publicly process all tricks that swivel epistemic progressions.
A Design for Problems
We cant uphold that research stays indispensable when keeping communications open.
Vocabulary, conceptualization, plus methodology, remain our cultures creepy summits.
By incorporating modern achievements, new approaches, fresh complexes of exertions,
We might meet social needs per salubrious interactions. Else, we might skip homework.
Collective nonage cannot eternally ascertain the essence of, stipulate phenomenological
Analyses of events besides offering rare critical-transcendental breakdowns of vile acts.
When organized data are scrutinized, interpreted, or evaluated for their nature, dystopic
Relationships subsequent discourse ought refrain from hinky unraveling of happenings.
Yet, few applications of some processes yield deep-rooted data that illuminate suspect
Social accountability. Hugh swaths of beauty grow nullified when, accordingly, sluiced.
Regardless, functional, & focal cues continue to be found in reticulated journal pooks,
Like champions of the Glass Bead game at Castalia, those data intimidate some others.
The Trouble with Fuzzy Distinctions
The fuzzy distinctions between alleged accountability and actual responsibility,
As mysteries, can be made manifest, can illume our unfamiliarity with disparate
Ethics. Yet, were deficient in snapshots of governing bodies basic vocabulary.
Those covert representations, fashioned by ascendency, remain highly puzzling.
Our studied pictures of rulers demonstrate how that needs lack prominence
Their inclusion never transcends the teleology concomitant to everyday people.
Thus, our theistic voluntarism, not their high falutin intellectualism, operates far
From unity with the big guns, fails to reflect our principles, keeps self-interest in
Just elites purview (obscured distinctions among normative, axiological, aretaic
Cues bring substantial, clearly distinguishable, principled arguments on partisans
Assessments of goods and services.) Traditional responses to societal conditions
Deserve critical and creative vehicles, not an acquiesce to our puerile superiors.
Copyright reserved. Please do not reproduce without consent.